Dot Richards, Art Gallery Page 1
the cover art for the album,'the best of the best of the best '
the cover art for the album,'the best of the best of the best '
telegram-video-5-5940333837912380776.mov
a woman is laying down on a bed a woman is laying down on the couch a woman is laying down on a couch a woman is playing with her pussy a woman is sucking a man with her hand a woman is sucking her pussy in the car a woman is sitting in the back of a car The back of the alley G is here from Paula's house in Levin. We're around here at the next door and from those bloody dolls to downtown. You know what I'm saying? From the mobile chicken. Your fire. This idea was tested. It looks like the art simulation. Well, then it was a terrible simulation. Get out. I have to go and let that go. I'm going to have sex with it. Hey, buddy. Hey, buddy. How are you doing here right now? She's right. What's going on here? I'm here. I'm here. You can go ahead and get your body. I'm here.
a woman is laying down on a bed a woman is laying down on the couch a woman is laying down on a couch a woman is playing with her pussy a woman is sucking a man with her hand a woman is sucking her pussy in the car a woman is sitting in the back of a car The back of the alley G is here from Paula's house in Levin. We're around here at the next door and from those bloody dolls to downtown. You know what I'm saying? From the mobile chicken. Your fire. This idea was tested. It looks like the art simulation. Well, then it was a terrible simulation. Get out. I have to go and let that go. I'm going to have sex with it. Hey, buddy. Hey, buddy. How are you doing here right now? She's right. What's going on here? I'm here. I'm here. You can go ahead and get your body. I'm here.
a woman with glasses on and a smile 04:50€ = =: < KURAFIRE Sr kurafire “ ¥// Museum of Modern Art Posts Follow 9 AV W 6 likes kurafire @teacup looking adorable. 1 October 2011 Se) kurafire “ ¥/"/ Museum of Modern Art
a woman with glasses on and a smile 04:50€ = =: < KURAFIRE Sr kurafire “ ¥// Museum of Modern Art Posts Follow 9 AV W 6 likes kurafire @teacup looking adorable. 1 October 2011 Se) kurafire “ ¥/"/ Museum of Modern Art
a person holding a book in their hand fie Bible urs and © d Dingsay San pout Dino _nosaurs live a li the Biby ions hen din 4 Wteray ’ Six b ic Quest about W! Mil, a iat nillions F yean bee O88 afer by be so WFO g acy, even * before a ane Howeg ientists d for accut "hich ‘ an ats sc eco Ory uri Ctake . “8tiveg 2d Mes so ea clean F dat germ the “The pre- oon *eNesis ot an ’ as coil exactly hav! scoffe ractices- _ Flange, sp be ao Splic nguj yf Hey «dont & ries ag ae medical p' four elements Sp cis, 7 € ; ist ‘01 : Sime ‘i Ks Slice g dq: ther 5 Seat © at, $e poy cence successtu hat only xperiments ‘or °MeS Useg 4 Nd dicg op thoy, alg hy fist basis for ce held Rigorous exp es of Xa » disco eve IY juasy © ene, ace’ ng Oy ull! an hi cientists On! 1 materials. Me evealed scor T six y d TING the Ii Nuch Ou, Sop tlie ee ng $ rise all mat doctrine © f elements. my “Y and ong I da of, Mis Me of eo iio? er-—-comP! e this doctn'! table of cles € h ents. 4 Sjeeti,e esrd eek 4 ‘tion Crag, Bt ateg sing ue and line & antes the periodic «ace scientists ar Me dq, Son Speci; ied Ses of Ihe, fp, alts BE e willi nized in d sinc ks 9 for neh bag ann od by chose Wh! ly organizec ast, an 1 to h OF thos Fen oy fy ned familiarly in the p < im ot ow wrong . lly mall aes nd ye 200705 OY jes have been ng. inanimate thar th fi "ad ¢ ough of eG, “th ht majonit can still be wro ¢ the idea that HH con- a nderming th nesig Sie ople, they ientists accep use each cel id see Me fr, : Orks o, Sha Mise aulible p any secular sci sng cellphone, But beca building what trusted wom sin ang clfshnes. ihe the Cross ‘ for eagles veto the first ining blueprints art ight plastic, en On re : i ro SaUrS and o, imal Savio, These COmprop, Peed of ny thy chemicals on coded apenas natural processes . What mo- gooey! ed Omises ving libraries 0} ike claiming thai al computer. aCCord; deca oe 2m th cans il is like clai eisoti 5g? Whatever s Cripe SSIS Io, a eds, this i the first p ario? enna 5 i le h " seat nvad the kd Ade ie ML metal together to fo bh an improbable ae lab bench ‘a © Fea, On 85, aN to suc ions earned h pe, ; e Log I 2 resule of sl arists to adhere i ds no affirmat ” Penal, ied ates secul ident idea fin 800d ation wh. e ay thar Marr, as pay Ur sin, i use, this life-by-accide: 3 Ve e 4 cause, Aesh,: €nesis sy dinos tC vegeraby ae 7 ot once fe: - riments. °2CTifice on, TOMIsCS ena e the f “len POC anima ope hs d the Mistry ang How Secularism Worl ; iracles, Its adherents dis aeeived n inking rejects mi ; s Jesus co! bh ly, §00d SClenCe dog. ot d, Acits core, secular think : ay in space and time. Was J ah 'DtO the cp, ation ace, Nt, nor do, & TWe squeene billions notion of God working uniqui nd the very ¢; acter of Ge Folk t force 4S to doube the Bible CNtific videnc, 8iVe us o fidence thar G at carbon lines of Cr all. Bur ; is I Od gor His h cb: by God's H. 2 Wi vining the relevant history, s ly Spirit? Without even examining i's Holy Spirit? ? Impossible, q Flood cover the entire sphere es 25 quote ltt say no. Did ig . ot allow a divine foot an . f an atheist book.’ a sears ape ean from his favorable aeahar Nozke Flood an scientist Richa: . estions Wirh- . ism’s anti-Bible bias leads to sugg e Fertile Crescent. * How Contd Mosy Scien ticy, Be Wrong? autem’ a regions, like the Back Sea oF she of science, ones = _ After share ¢ WO scientific evidences for "cent dinosaur depos. out the Possibility cot. 2 comes to dinosaurs, secular ¢ wide es ie i" Radiocarbon tmets—the second question my hes cine sas We 8 for the literal days of creation. authority of Sclentists, Eicher the Word of od Almig; ty is dead Wrong about a thousands-of years-old Cosmos, or Secular Scientists are dead Wrong abour millions of years. The evidence in this small book Monstrate inherit- eyes, perhaps M tendists:see'dhe world ea Esih, Scientific cul- lost scient ? or pro 5 ‘. arents an: der culture 2 . ive from their p: he broade ing this eee ecularism even more strongly than St ture may affirm. i 67
a person holding a book in their hand fie Bible urs and © d Dingsay San pout Dino _nosaurs live a li the Biby ions hen din 4 Wteray ’ Six b ic Quest about W! Mil, a iat nillions F yean bee O88 afer by be so WFO g acy, even * before a ane Howeg ientists d for accut "hich ‘ an ats sc eco Ory uri Ctake . “8tiveg 2d Mes so ea clean F dat germ the “The pre- oon *eNesis ot an ’ as coil exactly hav! scoffe ractices- _ Flange, sp be ao Splic nguj yf Hey «dont & ries ag ae medical p' four elements Sp cis, 7 € ; ist ‘01 : Sime ‘i Ks Slice g dq: ther 5 Seat © at, $e poy cence successtu hat only xperiments ‘or °MeS Useg 4 Nd dicg op thoy, alg hy fist basis for ce held Rigorous exp es of Xa » disco eve IY juasy © ene, ace’ ng Oy ull! an hi cientists On! 1 materials. Me evealed scor T six y d TING the Ii Nuch Ou, Sop tlie ee ng $ rise all mat doctrine © f elements. my “Y and ong I da of, Mis Me of eo iio? er-—-comP! e this doctn'! table of cles € h ents. 4 Sjeeti,e esrd eek 4 ‘tion Crag, Bt ateg sing ue and line & antes the periodic «ace scientists ar Me dq, Son Speci; ied Ses of Ihe, fp, alts BE e willi nized in d sinc ks 9 for neh bag ann od by chose Wh! ly organizec ast, an 1 to h OF thos Fen oy fy ned familiarly in the p < im ot ow wrong . lly mall aes nd ye 200705 OY jes have been ng. inanimate thar th fi "ad ¢ ough of eG, “th ht majonit can still be wro ¢ the idea that HH con- a nderming th nesig Sie ople, they ientists accep use each cel id see Me fr, : Orks o, Sha Mise aulible p any secular sci sng cellphone, But beca building what trusted wom sin ang clfshnes. ihe the Cross ‘ for eagles veto the first ining blueprints art ight plastic, en On re : i ro SaUrS and o, imal Savio, These COmprop, Peed of ny thy chemicals on coded apenas natural processes . What mo- gooey! ed Omises ving libraries 0} ike claiming thai al computer. aCCord; deca oe 2m th cans il is like clai eisoti 5g? Whatever s Cripe SSIS Io, a eds, this i the first p ario? enna 5 i le h " seat nvad the kd Ade ie ML metal together to fo bh an improbable ae lab bench ‘a © Fea, On 85, aN to suc ions earned h pe, ; e Log I 2 resule of sl arists to adhere i ds no affirmat ” Penal, ied ates secul ident idea fin 800d ation wh. e ay thar Marr, as pay Ur sin, i use, this life-by-accide: 3 Ve e 4 cause, Aesh,: €nesis sy dinos tC vegeraby ae 7 ot once fe: - riments. °2CTifice on, TOMIsCS ena e the f “len POC anima ope hs d the Mistry ang How Secularism Worl ; iracles, Its adherents dis aeeived n inking rejects mi ; s Jesus co! bh ly, §00d SClenCe dog. ot d, Acits core, secular think : ay in space and time. Was J ah 'DtO the cp, ation ace, Nt, nor do, & TWe squeene billions notion of God working uniqui nd the very ¢; acter of Ge Folk t force 4S to doube the Bible CNtific videnc, 8iVe us o fidence thar G at carbon lines of Cr all. Bur ; is I Od gor His h cb: by God's H. 2 Wi vining the relevant history, s ly Spirit? Without even examining i's Holy Spirit? ? Impossible, q Flood cover the entire sphere es 25 quote ltt say no. Did ig . ot allow a divine foot an . f an atheist book.’ a sears ape ean from his favorable aeahar Nozke Flood an scientist Richa: . estions Wirh- . ism’s anti-Bible bias leads to sugg e Fertile Crescent. * How Contd Mosy Scien ticy, Be Wrong? autem’ a regions, like the Back Sea oF she of science, ones = _ After share ¢ WO scientific evidences for "cent dinosaur depos. out the Possibility cot. 2 comes to dinosaurs, secular ¢ wide es ie i" Radiocarbon tmets—the second question my hes cine sas We 8 for the literal days of creation. authority of Sclentists, Eicher the Word of od Almig; ty is dead Wrong about a thousands-of years-old Cosmos, or Secular Scientists are dead Wrong abour millions of years. The evidence in this small book Monstrate inherit- eyes, perhaps M tendists:see'dhe world ea Esih, Scientific cul- lost scient ? or pro 5 ‘. arents an: der culture 2 . ive from their p: he broade ing this eee ecularism even more strongly than St ture may affirm. i 67
Updated 2025-01-18
Are you also interested in Dot Richards? Email us to discuss. Anonymity guaranteed.