Dot Richards, Bench Gallery Page 7

01231-1170588082-5805195002_df5388964d_o.jpg.jpeg

a naked woman is standing in front of a bench

a woman with red hair and a ring on her finger a naked girl with big tits a woman sitting in a bathtub with purple hair a woman sitting at a table with a plate of food a naked woman standing in front of a waterfall a naked girl sitting on a bench in the stands a woman with long red hair a woman with long brown hair a girl with glasses on a black background with a white and red flower a collage of four women smiling and laughing lets see whats this I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful.

$a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67$

IMG_4125 2.JPG

a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67