Dot Richards, Examining Gallery Page 1

a person holding a book in their hand fie Bible urs and © d Dingsay San pout Dino _nosaurs live a li the Biby ions hen din 4 Wteray ’ Six b ic Quest about W! Mil, a iat nillions F yean bee O88 afer by be so WFO g acy, even * before a ane Howeg ientists d for accut "hich ‘ an ats sc eco Ory uri Ctake . “8tiveg 2d Mes so ea clean F dat germ the “The pre- oon *eNesis ot an ’ as coil exactly hav! scoffe ractices- _ Flange, sp be ao Splic nguj yf Hey «dont & ries ag ae medical p' four elements Sp cis, 7 € ; ist ‘01 : Sime ‘i Ks Slice g dq: ther 5 Seat © at, $e poy cence successtu hat only xperiments ‘or °MeS Useg 4 Nd dicg op thoy, alg hy fist basis for ce held Rigorous exp es of Xa » disco eve IY juasy © ene, ace’ ng Oy ull! an hi cientists On! 1 materials. Me evealed scor T six y d TING the Ii Nuch Ou, Sop tlie ee ng $ rise all mat doctrine © f elements. my “Y and ong I da of, Mis Me of eo iio? er-—-comP! e this doctn'! table of cles € h ents. 4 Sjeeti,e esrd eek 4 ‘tion Crag, Bt ateg sing ue and line & antes the periodic «ace scientists ar Me dq, Son Speci; ied Ses of Ihe, fp, alts BE e willi nized in d sinc ks 9 for neh bag ann od by chose Wh! ly organizec ast, an 1 to h OF thos Fen oy fy ned familiarly in the p < im ot ow wrong . lly mall aes nd ye 200705 OY jes have been ng. inanimate thar th fi "ad ¢ ough of eG, “th ht majonit can still be wro ¢ the idea that HH con- a nderming th nesig Sie ople, they ientists accep use each cel id see Me fr, : Orks o, Sha Mise aulible p any secular sci sng cellphone, But beca building what trusted wom sin ang clfshnes. ihe the Cross ‘ for eagles veto the first ining blueprints art ight plastic, en On re : i ro SaUrS and o, imal Savio, These COmprop, Peed of ny thy chemicals on coded apenas natural processes . What mo- gooey! ed Omises ving libraries 0} ike claiming thai al computer. aCCord; deca oe 2m th cans il is like clai eisoti 5g? Whatever s Cripe SSIS Io, a eds, this i the first p ario? enna 5 i le h " seat nvad the kd Ade ie ML metal together to fo bh an improbable ae lab bench ‘a © Fea, On 85, aN to suc ions earned h pe, ; e Log I 2 resule of sl arists to adhere i ds no affirmat ” Penal, ied ates secul ident idea fin 800d ation wh. e ay thar Marr, as pay Ur sin, i use, this life-by-accide: 3 Ve e 4 cause, Aesh,: €nesis sy dinos tC vegeraby ae 7 ot once fe: - riments. °2CTifice on, TOMIsCS ena e the f “len POC anima ope hs d the Mistry ang How Secularism Worl ; iracles, Its adherents dis aeeived n inking rejects mi ; s Jesus co! bh ly, §00d SClenCe dog. ot d, Acits core, secular think : ay in space and time. Was J ah 'DtO the cp, ation ace, Nt, nor do, & TWe squeene billions notion of God working uniqui nd the very ¢; acter of Ge Folk t force 4S to doube the Bible CNtific videnc, 8iVe us o fidence thar G at carbon lines of Cr all. Bur ; is I Od gor His h cb: by God's H. 2 Wi vining the relevant history, s ly Spirit? Without even examining i's Holy Spirit? ? Impossible, q Flood cover the entire sphere es 25 quote ltt say no. Did ig . ot allow a divine foot an . f an atheist book.’ a sears ape ean from his favorable aeahar Nozke Flood an scientist Richa: . estions Wirh- . ism’s anti-Bible bias leads to sugg e Fertile Crescent. * How Contd Mosy Scien ticy, Be Wrong? autem’ a regions, like the Back Sea oF she of science, ones = _ After share ¢ WO scientific evidences for "cent dinosaur depos. out the Possibility cot. 2 comes to dinosaurs, secular ¢ wide es ie i" Radiocarbon tmets—the second question my hes cine sas We 8 for the literal days of creation. authority of Sclentists, Eicher the Word of od Almig; ty is dead Wrong about a thousands-of years-old Cosmos, or Secular Scientists are dead Wrong abour millions of years. The evidence in this small book Monstrate inherit- eyes, perhaps M tendists:see'dhe world ea Esih, Scientific cul- lost scient ? or pro 5 ‘. arents an: der culture 2 . ive from their p: he broade ing this eee ecularism even more strongly than St ture may affirm. i 67

$a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67$

IMG_4125 2.JPG

a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67