Dot Richards, Solo Gallery Page 96

three women are smiling and posing for the camera three girls are smiling and making the peace sign three women in pink dresses are smiling and posing for the camera a group of women are standing in front of a window three women are smiling and laughing in front of a window three women are laughing and laughing together a group of women in pink dresses singing the girls are all smiles and laughing together three girls in pink dresses are smiling and laughing three girls in pink dresses are smiling and posing for the camera Oh

IMG_2999.jpg

a man and a woman are playing a video game

IMG_3308.JPG

a woman sitting on a couch

$a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67$

IMG_4125 2.JPG

a person holding a book in their hand Dir No; 3 a literay py PUES ang and the Bible aie ay c; the g _nosauts mill, + Six by ib, Dine: ‘Ons of, UE Io, le pout lived ve; bef afte, questions ‘i dinosaurs iv q . ™ ang Howeg ng about whe! Utio, 2 tak, so we £1 rn —_ © long » © atti veg Sand a, jentist br evel TBC, Shary " Pes many 5° rd for accuracy> h same i % s co! i SMe aroun ‘ors Pliced 2a, Uiry 5 he yo! jy have a clean FEC cory, whic OF exanyp) °NeS Used ab, ean dic. ther 1 lean, Bide don't exactly o they scoffed at 8 tices. The Pre tsi e, Me apy TE the on thous Y shay, o aent centuries 26° | medical prac — Men. Thday- ang MS the Toe Hise a5 tion 4 Pakage Fi ints ae jg for success “id hat only four elemen CRS. Ang ip. Pd one j Mach og 4 COtine ¢ bey yj PO” ame the basis © held tha iments the q, And ify. j as day, td of, he this gt Some J aly become ag scientists ONCE terials. Rigorous €xP© f Oor ks 6 Uson 4 b. ek as gation A Metpen on ent pio? 0! compsise all ma sc Bev ealed scores © sel Siece ra ‘or ofa ed in ah 7aSe6 th an ig fie and ae g £0 challenge this doctr dic table of elements. ily} eM al} tho, e Te, asp arth al hose willin; . in the periods 2 thae th d 5 Com. Foaned by (DOS! ” tly organized in the p ince scientists are 2 eh oe an, Map, fore familiarly org? 1, and since s d see p “ a ine the Ge Si : a te pie 28 inti have been wrong 17 the pas Ss f jor trusted in 4, POPKS of cy © scientific ma hey can still be wrong. «sienate un ‘ 2 and lish Chri ses juible people: they cept the idea that inanima San PY Say, Ness wh he cro, keen secular scientists accep h cellphone con- . SS led he example, many 2 {]. Bur because eac accord S died com, Penteg Of py 0 d into the first living cellphone. ; puilding what OMmans 5.75) rpture, le he M88 all mean ceils nae si 4 specifications jike blueprints for buil h Bo : , Ossils 4 aN th, ans libraries of coded | brought plastic, earned g, © Whol, A invad long bop, a cans libre pes iming that natural processes each Ole reas, dy Hre Ada ii needs, this is like claiming t What mo- 800d” Penal, 3 ‘Orld ag ‘am the cellphone needs, the first personal computer. Bech» Creation whe es Penaley ha ma I ed 4 tesul Ws gh and metal together to form on niprotle scenario? Whatever a Ti . a Nesis A dinos, Te as PAY our sin. tivates secularists to adhere to suc frmations fois lab ‘bench actifice, SOM pr Omises ore Vegetable mare OF8 Once the cause, this life-by-accident idea finds no affirm: era; ree * © the f, f ROC anima experiments. ru, Jesus’ min: ye ately, 00d 5, MiDistey ang Works Cars in Clenc How Secularism Worl nd the £0 the cr ation acco, does not dem, snaking rej iracles. Its adherents discard the entif, Cly ch Tacter of G NE, Nor do, tk Squeeze bit, Acits core, secular thinking rejects miracles. Its a wed + " i : ‘ r © evideng, Bive us ‘od, collagen a qe doubt the Bie notion of God working uniquely in space and time. Was Jesus conce Fall. Bur chic I “onfidence thar Go Hocarbon lines of, by God's Holy Spirit? Without even examining the relevant history, <i : - a : foa Second im ors Sor His istory exactly toh, larists say no. Did the Flood cover the entire sphere of Earth? Impossible, Question 2: How GQ At quest 8 say secularists, who “cannot allow a divine foot in the door,” to quote Aft Ould Mosy Scien pi, scientist Richard Lewontin from his favorable review of an atheist book. tio: SFT share WO sciens: ts Be Wrong? Secularism’s anti-Bible bias leads to suggestions that Noah's Flood only a ig Collagen and ¢, Clentific evidences for recent d Covered certain regions, like the Black Sea or the Fertile Crescent, With- Udiences ash. deals wi h € radiocarbon Umers-—the 5 anne deposi out the possibility of miracles, God is taken out of science, origins, and od Almig; tY is dead {1 the authority of Scientists, Etta Question a) Out of a secularist’s life. So when it comes to dinosaurs, secular thinking Secular Scientises 4 Wrong about a thousands-of. i old a ee *asno place or patience, for che Hiceral Geopioficrestion. * are id -Ol-years-old ¢ this smalf ead wrong about mys OsmMOs, or . is uc m Most tists see the world through secular eyes, perhaps inherit- book “Monstrates tha (Hons of years. The evidence in perspective Elamnsthe me fase See: © people—nor ing this perspective from their parents and/or professors. Scientific cul- ! ture may affirm secularism even more strongly than the broader culture i 67